I wasn't aware of this. No objections to changing it. In fact, I
actively encourage it.
-Ivan
On 14 November 2014 01:56, Sijie Guo guosi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys:
I am revisiting the auto-recovery code. There were tons of synchronous
calls in asynchronous callbacks (zookeeper/bookkeeper
Yeah, I had noticed the synchronous ZK calls. +1 for making them asynchronous.
-Flavio
On Friday, November 14, 2014 10:48 AM, Ivan Kelly i...@ivankelly.net
wrote:
I wasn't aware of this. No objections to changing it. In fact, I
actively encourage it.
-Ivan
On 14 November 2014
On Nov. 12, 2014, 4:33 p.m., fpj wrote:
I quite like the changes here, they make sense to me. I just have one
clarification question and a small suggestion below.
I'm happy with the changes. Any other comment here or should I get this in?
On Nov. 12, 2014, 4:33 p.m., fpj wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27529/#review61600
---
I will review this over this weekend.
- Sijie Guo
On Nov. 13,
