[boost] Is a 3% timing difference reliably repeatable in real code?

2003-05-08 Thread Darin Adler
On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 07:04 AM, Beman Dawes wrote: A 2-3% timing difference probably isn't reliably repeatable in real code. How code and data happens to land in hardware caches can easily swamp out such a small difference. The version-to-version or step-to-step differences in CPU's,

Re: [boost] Filesystem on mac

2002-11-09 Thread Darin Adler
On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 06:04 PM, Beman Dawes wrote: So no need to guess, except in the case of a system which supports multiple system specific formats. It's a kind of funny situation. Mac OS X does of course have enough POSIX support that the POSIX implementation can be used. But

Re: [boost] Filesystem on mac

2002-11-09 Thread Darin Adler
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 11:23 AM, Beman Dawes wrote: it sounds to me as if boost::filesystem::path's system_specific constructor and access functions should be used for Macintosh style paths, and the generic constructor and access functions (as always) be used for generic (ie