Re: [boost] Re: XMLUI (was Re: Re: UI++)

2003-08-17 Thread David Bradley
to focus on one goal rather than multiple. I think timing will be more critical now than creating alternatives. David Bradley ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: [boost] Re: XMLUI (was Re: Re: UI++)

2003-08-17 Thread David Bradley
Oh, just realized there is XULMaker for XUL. I haven't played with it much, so not sure how good it is. David Bradley ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: [boost] Re: XMLUI (was Re: Re: UI++)

2003-08-17 Thread David Bradley
provide an intelligent argument as I know little about both. I was just wondering if one could benefit from the other. David Bradley ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: [boost] Re: Re: Smart pointers: One more implementation +question

2003-02-06 Thread David Bradley
is something to seriously consider and weigh. David Bradley ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: [boost] Re: Re: Smart pointers: One more implementation +question

2003-02-05 Thread David Bradley
based system that would allow them more control. David Bradley smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [boost] Re: Re: Smart pointers: One more implementation +question

2003-02-05 Thread David Bradley
been able to use such a smart pointer, as it is, Mozilla is reinventing the wheel instead of using Boost. David Bradley ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost