From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] date_time naming
I'm just getting started with the date_time library, and I
think I'm gonna like it. I have some quibbles with the
naming choices though (shocking! me of all people!) For
example, why is the nested
From: Fernando Cacciola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mat Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Those who answer no to the above question may
prefer to write code that uniformly handles T and optionalT.
I doubt such uniformity can be implemented smoothly.
From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: [uBlas] Any Performance Resulst Data with uBlas?
Patrick Kowalzick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Matthew,
I like these statistics. Nice graphs.
Did you test the block_prod compared to normal prod as well ?
-Original Message-
From: Firingme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: [uBlas] Any Performance Resulst Data with uBlas?
Then Matthew, refer to your graph result data, the champion
and the runner-up all are C libs but not C++
.. Does it means if I
From: Firingme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where is uBlas-dev list ???
I can't find it
It is a yahoo groups thingo at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ublas-dev/
Check out
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Effective_UBL
AS too.
Cheers,
Matt.
From: Firingme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a newbie to uBlas , but have used MTL for a long time.
Before I learned MTL, I've founded MTL's performance result
graph data on the following URL:
http://www.osl.iu.edu/research/mtl/performance.php3
Now, is there any performance result
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Cacciola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: although this library is new, google shows (to my
satisfaction) that there are already a couple of users of
Optional out there.
Simple and effective. It is in a production system here.
Many thanks,
