you should, but you are not required to by the license.
--
Jon Kalb Alexander Stepanov, the Keynote Speaker for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SmartFriends(TM) U: Languages and Libraries
Sept. 26-28 http://SmartFriends.com/U
This sounds to me like the goals of the Whisper framework. Check out
Whisper 2 on source forge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] GUI/GDI
On 2003-02-21 7:06 AM, Anthony Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link to Cargill's article in more/generic_exception_safety.html is no
longer valid. The correct link is:
http://www.awprofessional.com/content/images/020163371x/supplements/Exception_
Handling_Article.html
(Why it is a
On 2003-02-12 5:56 AM, Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jon Kalb wrote:
I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have a compile time error in this
situation rather than to create a trap for the unsuspecting. It does
put an additional burden on the user to ensure that the types
:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/shifted_ptr/pick_of.hpp
Philippe A. Bouchard
If a user attempts to use this on a non-polymorphic object, will they get a
compile time error or run-time error?
Jon Kalb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Unsubscribe
On 2003-02-11 8:47 PM, Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jon Kalb wrote:
[...]
If a user attempts to use this on a non-polymorphic object, will they
get a compile time error or run-time error?
No compile-time error, but a run-time error may occur if multiple
inheritance
-Original Message-
From: David B. Held [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: [MPL] Making Generators
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin S. Van Horn [mailto:Kevin.VanHorn;ndsu.NoDak.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [boost] Proposed Boost Assert -- once again
Peter Dimov write:
Throwing an exception from BOOST_ASSERT is undesired
