Hi,
I am trying to find regression test results for gcc-3.3 on linux and
Intel 7.1 on Linux. Are the meta-intel-7.1 results at
http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering for windows or linux?
Does anyone have regression results for gcc/intel on linux?
By the way, these results are really useful, t
Hello all,
Recently, I had the following problem in some library code I maintain.
I provide users with a macro which generates fairly complex typedefs:
#define MAKE_TYPEDEF(Ident, etc) typedef complicated Identifier;
Users use the macro to define a bunch of different types, all with
identifi
Hi,
for_each seems to be unable to deal with empty lists, or lists that
are built by push_front on an empty list. However, vectors work
fine. Here is code which demonstrates the problem. Replacing list with
vector makes the code compile.
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#inclu
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>
> // (C) Jane Programmer, 2003
> // See www.boost.org/license for license terms and conditions
> // See www.boost.org/libs/janes-lib for documentation
>
> Looks fine to me, though I prefer "Copyright" to (C)
>
> Paul
I have been told by previ
Hi all,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>
> "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > template void * operator new(size_t n, optional & t);
> >
>
> Anyway, there are still problems with this: operator new is called _before_
> the T is cons
Hi all,
I have not followed this discussion closely, but I did want to add on one
point:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> >
> > BTW what if I want ? as a part of my parameter name?
>
> Do you need this really?
>
> > For example:
> >
> > my_program /roll trace file? = "yes"
> >
>
Hi,
Just as a note to those scanning files for copyright messages, I was once
informed by lawyers at one of my former employers that the string "(C)"
(that is, a capital C in parenthesis) has no legal standing - only the
word "copyright" or the copyright symbol (not available in ASCII) legally
i