Peter Dimov wrote:
>
> intrusive_ptr will be "official" (read: I finally wrote something resembling
> a documentation) in the upcoming 1.30. But that's not my point. My point is
> that you need an intrusive smart pointer. Of course shared_ptr cannot offer
I know I needed an intrusive smart pointe
Daniel Frey wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>
>> Daniel Frey wrote:
>>>
>>> I aim for a smart pointer which is 4 bytes and adds another 4 bytes
>>> to the intrusivly counted object - no more. AFAICS boost cannot
>>> offer this with the current design.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, you are saying th
