RE: [boost] Date/Time to string conversions

2002-12-10 Thread Jeff Garland
> > In general, based on review comments, the library has moved to > > using iostreams with facets for doing I/O since this takes into > > account the issues of localization and wide characters. There > > was controversy about whether string conversion should even > > be part of the library with

RE: [boost] Date/Time to string conversions

2002-12-10 Thread Yitzhak Sapir
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Jeff Garland wrote: > Yitzhak Sapir wrote: > > The date/time library provides several implementations of date/time string >conversion. > > Unfortunately, none of these include formatted date/time conversions. In trying to > > duplicate the functionality of VarFormat for dates

RE: [boost] Date/Time to string conversions

2002-12-08 Thread Jeff Garland
Yitzhak Sapir wrote: > The date/time library provides several implementations of date/time string >conversion. > Unfortunately, none of these include formatted date/time conversions. In trying to > duplicate the functionality of VarFormat for dates, I can do so (relatively) easily What is VarF

[boost] Date/Time to string conversions

2002-12-08 Thread Yitzhak Sapir
The date/time library provides several implementations of date/time string conversion. Unfortunately, none of these include formatted date/time conversions. In trying to duplicate the functionality of VarFormat for dates, I can do so (relatively) easily only in one way (from date to string), s