At 07:17 AM 3/17/2003, Thomas Witt wrote:
>the library name is still "fs". I was under the impression that this was
>only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible
>"boost_filesystem" before release. From a pratical point of view "fs"
>seems like begging for a nameclash.
Good poin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Beman,
the library name is still "fs". I was under the impression that this was
only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible
"boost_filesystem" before release. From a pratical point of view "fs"
seems like begging for a nameclash.
Th
Rene Rivera wrote:
Not totally right... It should be:
libboost__.lib.
Putting the version at the end is somewhat standard. And in my current case
of OpenBSD required.
That may be standard on OpenBSD, but it's not on Windows, where the last
part of the filename is used to tell the type of
[2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote:
>Rene Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> [2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>>Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote:
> At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote:
> >windows. Judging by
Rene Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote:
>
>>Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote:
At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote:
>windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other curre
[2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote:
>Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote:
>>> At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote:
>>> >windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current
boost
>>> >libraries, shouldn't this library
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote:
>> At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote:
>> >windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current boost
>> >libraries, shouldn't this library be called "libboost_filesystem.lib"?
>>
>>
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote:
> At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote:
> >windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current boost
> >libraries, shouldn't this library be called "libboost_filesystem.lib"?
>
> Yes, I guess. I'll add it to the do list.
>
Isn't t
At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote:
>Hi, I have just build the filesystem for the first time from the current
>CVS
>state and I notice that the filesystem library is called "libfs.lib" on
>windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current boost
>libraries, shouldn't this li
Hi, I have just build the filesystem for the first time from the current CVS
state and I notice that the filesystem library is called "libfs.lib" on
windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current boost
libraries, shouldn't this library be called "libboost_filesystem.lib"?
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
