Re: [boost] Proposal: Identifying libraries

2002-12-17 Thread Peter Dimov
From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 01:10 PM 12/16/2002, Peter Dimov wrote: but how does this affect (implementation detail) headers that aren't necessarily part of a specific library? boost/detail/lightweight_mutex.hpp, boost/assert.hpp, boost/throw_exception.hpp, for example. Good

[boost] Proposal: Identifying libraries

2002-12-16 Thread Beman Dawes
We've got two cases where it would be very useful to be able to easily extract the library name from a header file: * Generating a dependency analysis based on library names rather than than header names. * Reporting problems (tabs in files, etc.) with an automatic scanning tool. We currently

Re: [boost] Proposal: Identifying libraries

2002-12-16 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Monday 16 December 2002 09:17 am, Beman Dawes wrote: I'd like to propose changing that (particularly for headers) to: // See http://www.boost.org/library-name for documentation. I assume you mean http://www.boost.org/libs/library-name;? and require that it be the first instance of

Re: [boost] Proposal: Identifying libraries

2002-12-16 Thread Peter Dimov
From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 11:15 AM 12/16/2002, Douglas Gregor wrote: On Monday 16 December 2002 09:17 am, Beman Dawes wrote: I'd like to propose changing that (particularly for headers) to: // See http://www.boost.org/library-name for documentation. I assume you mean

Re: [boost] Proposal: Identifying libraries

2002-12-16 Thread Beman Dawes
At 01:10 PM 12/16/2002, Peter Dimov wrote: From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 11:15 AM 12/16/2002, Douglas Gregor wrote: Sounds good. I think we should try to do the conversion automatically, at least for all files in subdirectories (e.g., the file boost/xxx/yyy.hpp would be assumed