At 09:48 AM 3/18/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>>> it seems to me that these aren't actually legal specializations
>>> (though I've never specialized functions before so I could be wrong).
>>> Shouldn't that be:
>>>
>>> template <>
>>> inline type_info type_id(bo
> I think we need to keep the argument for VC6 at least; the problem is
> one that shows up at link time because VC6 seems to distinguish
> function template instantiations only by the types of the arguments
> and not the template parameters. If you amend the patch so that it
> still uses the defa
> "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There are gcc 2.96 (Redhat 7.3) compilation error for
> > boost/libs/python/test/opaque.cpp:
> >
> > http://cci.lbl.gov/~rwgk/tmp/rc_1_30_0_opaque_fail.txt
> >
> > More recent gcc's don't seems to suffer from this problem.
> > I am not
There are gcc 2.96 (Redhat 7.3) compilation error for
boost/libs/python/test/opaque.cpp:
http://cci.lbl.gov/~rwgk/tmp/rc_1_30_0_opaque_fail.txt
More recent gcc's don't seems to suffer from this problem.
I am not sure this is important enough to delay the release any further.
David?
Ralf
__
