On Thursday 17 April 2003 10:04 am, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Douglas Gregor wrote:
> > The efficiency won't be any worse than using a bind object elsewhere in a
> > program. The do_on_XXX functions merely augment the visitor list of
> > dfs_visitor and return a new dfs_visitor object.
>
> This precis
Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Thursday 17 April 2003 03:50 am, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > IOW, now specifying behaviour for event requires creating a new class,
> > with "event_filter" typedef and operator(). You propose to pass lambda,
> > immediately on dfs_visitor creation. I think this is indeed con
On Thursday 17 April 2003 03:50 am, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> IOW, now specifying behaviour for event requires creating a new class, with
> "event_filter" typedef and operator(). You propose to pass lambda,
> immediately on dfs_visitor creation. I think this is indeed convenient.
> I've some concerns
