Re: [boost] RE: Any interest in a stats class

2003-03-01 Thread Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
At Tuesday 2003/02/25 09:10, you wrote: Please remember that stats can be more general. I frequently use stats for complex types. In that case, mean is also complex, but var is scalar. The proposed implementation doesn't address this. You sure lost me. Would you care to point out _where_ the pr

Re: [boost] RE: Any interest in a stats class

2003-02-25 Thread Neal D. Becker
Please remember that stats can be more general. I frequently use stats for complex types. In that case, mean is also complex, but var is scalar. The proposed implementation doesn't address this. On Tuesday 25 February 2003 12:29 am, Jason D Schmidt wrote: > I know this is well after the discu

[boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class

2003-02-25 Thread Hubert Holin
Somewhere in the E.U., le 25/02/2003 Bonjour In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason D Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this is well after the discussion on the stats class has ended, > but I think I have a good idea here. > > Scott Kirkwood proposed a class that behaves somethin

[boost] RE: Any interest in a stats class

2003-02-24 Thread Jason D Schmidt
I know this is well after the discussion on the stats class has ended, but I think I have a good idea here.   Scott Kirkwood proposed a class that behaves something like this:     stats myStats;    for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {    myStats.add(i);    }    cout << "Average: " << myStats.

RE: [boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class

2003-02-21 Thread Paul A. Bristow
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hubert Holin > > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:25 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class > > > > > > > > > Somewhere in the E.U., le 14/02/2003 > &g

[boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class

2003-02-17 Thread Hubert Holin
iday, February 14, 2003 1:25 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class > > > > > > Somewhere in the E.U., le 14/02/2003 > > > > > > There still is the question of whether similarity with NR is a > > proble

RE: [boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class

2003-02-14 Thread Paul A. Bristow
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hubert Holin > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class > > > Somewhere in the E.U., le 14/02/2

[boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class

2003-02-14 Thread Hubert Holin
Somewhere in the E.U., le 14/02/2003 Bonjour In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Paul A. Bristow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stats are definitely a must-have for Boost, but as ever, the presentation is > not > so easy to agree upon. I agree statistical utilities are a must. As many of

[boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class

2003-02-11 Thread Scott Kirkwood
Well what do you know... The "order_2_accumulator" class on that page looks just like my "stats" class. I threw in min and max and have more functions, but otherwise it's the same. -Scott Jeff Garland wrote: ... Specifically concerning statistics see: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bi