Re: [boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT - a little better

2003-06-23 Thread John Torjo
- Original Message - From: "Pavel Vozenilek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:38 PM Subject: [boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT - a little better > > "John Torjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message &g

[boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT - a little better

2003-06-20 Thread Pavel Vozenilek
"John Torjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > > I was just thinking (actually, I needed this, while doing some coding), that > STATIC_ASSERT could get a little of the SMART_ASSERT flavour. > > What am I talking about? > In case a STATIC_ASSERT fails, how abou