Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
You would have to go back and find the specific license. No way
to tell without seeing the exact license covering the code you started
with.
Copyright (c) 1994
Hewlett-Packard Company
Copyright (c) 1996,1997
Silicon
Eric Martel wrote:
[snip]
Nearly 5 months later, did anyone work on this bimap? Will it be included
anytime soon in an official distribution of boost?
On a related issue: has anyone worked on boost::map? It was supposed to
be a generalisation of bimap, being able to work with an arbitrary
Dirk Gerrits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Martel wrote:
[snip]
Nearly 5 months later, did anyone work on this bimap? Will it be
included anytime soon in an official distribution of boost?
On a related issue: has anyone worked on boost::map? It was
At 06:03 PM 3/12/2003, David B. Held wrote:
On an unrelated note, one thing that might be a concern is that I did not
write the map from scratch. I used the STLport implementation of
std::map, which came from SGI or HP (or both, for all I remember). I
wonder if the license is Boost-compatible?
Eric Martel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Nearly 5 months later, did anyone work on this bimap?
I didn't. ;)
Will it be included anytime soon in an official distribution of boost?
Not unless someone ambitious like you decides to work on it some
more. ;)
