[boost] Re: Non-portable help text of operators library.

2003-08-19 Thread Daniel Frey
Daniel Spangenberg wrote: Daniel Frey schrieb: You are correct. It's on my ToDo-list and I will take care of it along with some other changes that I would like to make to the documentation (mostly restructuring). Currently, my time doesn't permit much work on it, but if you'd like to speed things

[boost] Re: Non-portable help text of operators library.

2003-08-19 Thread Daniel Spangenberg
Hello Daniel, Daniel Frey schrieb: > You are correct. It's on my ToDo-list and I will take care of it along > with some other changes that I would like to make to the documentation > (mostly restructuring). Currently, my time doesn't permit much work on > it, but if you'd like to speed things up,

[boost] Re: Non-portable help text of operators library.

2003-08-19 Thread Daniel Frey
Daniel Spangenberg wrote: Since I see strong activities in overworking parts of the documentation, I would like to remember the open question concerning the help text section "Separate, Explicit Instantiation" > > [...] > among the "discussees" I think, that we can be assume, that the current text