Re: [boost] Re: Package for Cygwin distribution

2003-06-20 Thread Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
--- Reed Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > However, in my experience GCC 3.3 is a lot worse than 3.2, so if That's my experience, too, but I don't use cygwin. General observations: - we had to add a couple of gcc 3.3 specific workarounds to Boo

Re: [boost] Re: Package for Cygwin distribution

2003-06-20 Thread Reed Hedges
Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Neal D. Becker Jun 19 2003 3:32PM > >> If you are starting out, why not use current cygwin? > >> > > > > Do you mean why not use GCC (3.2)? > > Because 3.2 is buggy and I can't use it with my software. And it > > would take me quite some time to dow

[boost] Re: Package for Cygwin distribution

2003-06-20 Thread David Abrahams
Reed Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >> > > Neal D. Becker Jun 19 2003 3:32PM >> If you are starting out, why not use current cygwin? >> > > Do you mean why not use GCC (3.2)? > Because 3.2 is buggy and I can't use it with my software. And it