Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
> > Ah, that's the reason. But given my recent discomfort about
> > unmaintainable code, look at it again:
> >
> > # if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__HP_aCC, <= 33900)
> > template struct enable_if;
> > # else
> > template struct enable_if;
> > # endif
> >
> > Does t
On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:38 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
> Ah, that's the reason. But given my recent discomfort about
> unmaintainable code, look at it again:
>
> # if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__HP_aCC, <= 33900)
> template struct enable_if;
> # else
> template struct enable_if;
> #
> Ah, that's the reason. But given my recent discomfort about
> unmaintainable code, look at it again:
>
> # if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__HP_aCC, <= 33900)
> template struct enable_if;
> # else
> template struct enable_if;
> # endif
>
> Does this really makes sense? Shouldn't we jus
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>
> Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> > Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>
> >>This was the original source:
> >>
> >>template struct enable_if;
> >>---^
> >>
> >>Visual Age doesn't like this, it needs a name here.
> >
> > ^^
> >
> > Ah, that's the reason. But g
Daniel Frey wrote:
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
When posting the patch, I didn't even realize that the code was legal
and that this is a problem with VACPP6. And the aCC workaround fixes
the problem for VA, too.
This was the original source:
template struct enable_if;
---^
V
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>
> Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:37:51 +0100, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> >
> >> Attached is a small patch for function_base.hpp. On line 302,
> >> there is a T missing.
> >
> > Just a stupid question: Why is it "missing"? What is this patch
> > supposed t
Daniel Frey wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:37:51 +0100, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Attached is a small patch for function_base.hpp. On line 302,
there is a T missing.
Just a stupid question: Why is it "missing"? What is this patch
supposed to fix?
This was the original source:
template struct
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:37:51 +0100, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Attached is a small patch for function_base.hpp. On line 302, there is a
> T missing.
Just a stupid question: Why is it "missing"? What is this patch supposed
to fix?
Regards, Daniel
___
Un
