"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With BCC5.5.1 typename is _never required_ AFAIK, but it is with BCC5.6.0(4)
I guess in that case BOOST_TYPENAME or BOOST_NO_TYPENAME might be an
appropriate name. I'm glad I didn't move on the renaming before you
revealed the Borland issue!
--
"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> * [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME
> >> Status currently unknown. John? Aleksey?
> >>
> > >Dave A. introduced the macro I would prefer him to change it as he
know
