"Jeff Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I don't think the it is technically a union because the result draws in > points in the time period that aren't part of either of the initial periods. > Anyway I wrote the code as merge_inclusive so unless you have a major > objection I'll leave it that way pending a better idea...
Yes, of course, it is not really a union either. I think merge_inclusive is fine. Chris _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
