Re: [boost] Re: Re: STL applied to disk

2002-11-19 Thread David Abrahams
"Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:52:19PM -0500, David Abrahams wrote: >> "Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:38:27AM -0500, David Abrahams wrote: >> >> I haven't been paying attention, but IIUC what you're pr

Re: [boost] Re: Re: STL applied to disk

2002-11-19 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:52:19PM -0500, David Abrahams wrote: > "Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:38:27AM -0500, David Abrahams wrote: > >> I haven't been paying attention, but IIUC what you're proposing, these > >> things are no longer conforming ite

Re: [boost] Re: Re: STL applied to disk

2002-11-19 Thread David Abrahams
"Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:38:27AM -0500, David Abrahams wrote: >> "Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > So... I am beginning to lean towards the "don't do that" approach where I >> > simply don't allow the user to call member meth

Re: [boost] Re: Re: STL applied to disk

2002-11-19 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:38:27AM -0500, David Abrahams wrote: > "Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So... I am beginning to lean towards the "don't do that" approach where I > > simply don't allow the user to call member methods on items in the > > container. (And not let them ta

Re: [boost] Re: Re: STL applied to disk

2002-11-19 Thread David Abrahams
"Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry for the latency; was ill. > > A status update (since I was working without internet while sick). > > I have a working vector wrapper as a prototype. It supports every > operation and type specificied on the SGI site except i->foo(), and > ve

Re: [boost] Re: Re: STL applied to disk

2002-11-19 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
Sorry for the latency; was ill. A status update (since I was working without internet while sick). I have a working vector wrapper as a prototype. It supports every operation and type specificied on the SGI site except i->foo(), and vector::pointer is void*. The iterators are random access, if mu

[boost] Re: Re: STL applied to disk

2002-11-13 Thread Bohdan
"Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:20021112185744.GA850@;ito.tu-darmstadt.de... > Yes, I already have that solved: Wow, i underestimated what you have now. If you already have transactions, locking ... this is cool. > You get a transaction object from the environment.