Re: [boost] Re: Re: smart assert (was: ENFORCE/betterassertiontechnique)

2003-05-22 Thread Rob Stewart
From: "John Torjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If VERIFY is used in MFC to mean an assert even in release mode then > that > > is > > > probably the best name. > > In MFC it doesn't have that meaning though. It means that the expression > > passed to VERIFY will get evaluated in the release build

Re: [boost] Re: Re: smart assert (was: ENFORCE/betterassertiontechnique)

2003-05-08 Thread John Torjo
> > If VERIFY is used in MFC to mean an assert even in release mode then that > is > > probably the best name. > In MFC it doesn't have that meaning though. It means that the expression > passed to VERIFY will get evaluated in the release build but the result of > this expression will not get che

[boost] Re: Re: smart assert (was: ENFORCE/ betterassertiontechnique)

2003-05-08 Thread Sam Saariste
> If VERIFY is used in MFC to mean an assert even in release mode then that is > probably the best name. In MFC it doesn't have that meaning though. It means that the expression passed to VERIFY will get evaluated in the release build but the result of this expression will not get checked in releas