[boost] Re: SocketAddress and Nameresolution

2002-11-26 Thread Michel André
> > 1. getaddrinfo is thread-safe. And not all OS provide those > > functions like gethostbyname_r > > > > 2. getaddrinfo resovle one name to multiaddresses, especially a > > name with both IPv4 addresses, and IPv6 addresses. > > Just as a side note. getaddrinfo is only supported on Windows X

[boost] Re: SocketAddress and Nameresolution

2002-11-26 Thread Markus Schöpflin
Hu Xinwei wrote: > That poster was me(sorry, I dont familiar with wiki). IMHO, > addrinfo/getaddrinof/freeaddrinfo are much better than those > obsoleted gethostbyname The reasons are simple. > > 1. getaddrinfo is thread-safe. And not all OS provide those > functions like gethostbyname_r > > 2

[boost] Re: SocketAddress and Nameresolution

2002-11-26 Thread Hu Xinwei
>There seems to be support for independent resolution, proposed as a >getaddrinfo wrapper for hostname+service resolution, or by Michel's >ip_resolver class for hostname resolution. >Which other protocols can use name resolution? >There is also a strong push for unified ip4, ip6 address class. >M