"William E. Kempf" schrieb:
>
> 20.3.3/8
>
> "For templates greater, less, greater_equal, and less_equal, the
> specializations for any pointer type yield a total order, even if the
> builtin operators <, >, <=, >= do not."
Grummph, you are absolutely right, of course, and I should have known i
Daniel Spangenberg said:
> Hello William!
>
> "William E. Kempf" schrieb:
>
>> You're correct, and the solution is simply to replace the < operator
>> with std::less calls.
>
> You mean the std::less specialization on boost::mutex? (I wasn't aware,
> that you provide total ordering on mutexes). Ot
Hello William!
"William E. Kempf" schrieb:
> You're correct, and the solution is simply to replace the < operator with
> std::less calls.
You mean the std::less specialization on boost::mutex? (I wasn't aware, that
you provide total ordering on mutexes). Otherwise I don't see the difference,
I h
