Re: [boost] Re: strict_weak_ordering

2002-11-26 Thread Jaakko Jarvi
> >> make_tuple(ref(x1), ref(y1), ref(z1)) < ... > > > > Isn't this equivalent to > > > > tie(x1, y1, z1) < tie(x2, y2, z2) > > > > ? > > I think so! It is. /Jaakko ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.

Re: [boost] Re: strict_weak_ordering

2002-11-26 Thread David Abrahams
Dirk Gerrits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> >> make_tuple(ref(x1), ref(y1), ref(z1)) < ... > > Isn't this equivalent to > > tie(x1, y1, z1) < tie(x2, y2, z2) > > ? I think so! -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-

[boost] Re: strict_weak_ordering

2002-11-26 Thread Dirk Gerrits
David Abrahams wrote: Ben Young writes: >On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, David Abrahams wrote: > > >>Ben Young writes: >> >> >>>Recently at our company we had a couple of bugs relating to people >>>incorrectly writing comparison operators, so I came up with this little >>>helper. It is very trivial, but