Re: [boost] Recent changes to Boost.Function break CWPro7.2

2002-11-13 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 03:26 pm, David Abrahams wrote: > > I've put in an (attempted) fix. If it doesn't work, we'll probably need > > to define > > BOOST_FUNCTION_NO_ENABLE_IF > > for this platform. > > I'm afraid that's what you'll have to do: t'is done. Doug __

Re: [boost] Recent changes to Boost.Function break CWPro7.2

2002-11-13 Thread David Abrahams
Douglas Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 13 November 2002 12:30 pm, David Abrahams wrote: >> You can see the results at: >> >> http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1037181601/dailylog_win32_cw72_test > > I've put in an (attempted) fix. If it doesn't work, we'll probably need to

Re: [boost] Recent changes to Boost.Function break CWPro7.2

2002-11-13 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 12:30 pm, David Abrahams wrote: > You can see the results at: > > http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1037181601/dailylog_win32_cw72_test I've put in an (attempted) fix. If it doesn't work, we'll probably need to define BOOST_FUNCTION_NO_ENABLE_IF for this platfo

[boost] Recent changes to Boost.Function break CWPro7.2

2002-11-13 Thread David Abrahams
You can see the results at: http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1037181601/dailylog_win32_cw72_test I've also enclosed the results of the function regression tests here, where the same error, illegal use template argument dependent type 'T::value' shows up as well. function.zip De