Sure. But the question is: which should the default be?
I'm not sure that we know enough to choose at this time.
John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
I assume the current definition of ~d1() is because some compilers
generate an implicit destructor with a non-empty
exception-specification, which then causes an error? I'm wondering if
we wouldn't be better off just defining ~d1 for those compilers, since
many other compilers are likely to
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assume the current definition of ~d1() is because some compilers
generate an implicit destructor with a non-empty
exception-specification, which then causes an error? I'm wondering if
we wouldn't be better off just defining ~d1 for those compilers,
