Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8

2003-01-17 Thread John Maddock
I don't know. The current CVS uses the Borland configuration for __BORLANDC__, __IBMC__, __IBMCPP__, __SUNPRO_CC. I assume that __SUNPRO_CC is the operative symbol here, but I don't know if it's the same compiler or not. If not, than whatever compiler it is needs to be added to the config

Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8

2003-01-16 Thread David Abrahams
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This seems to be a problem with the PP lib and MPL, anyone any ideas? Suggest that he try it with Boost.Build first. -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training,

Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8

2003-01-16 Thread Paul Mensonides
- Original Message - From: John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] This seems to be a problem with the PP lib and MPL, anyone any ideas? The config should never even see the BOOST_PP_CHECK_... macros. It should be using the Borland configuration: #define BOOST_PP_CONFIG_FLAGS()

Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8

2003-01-16 Thread David Abrahams
Paul Mensonides [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - From: John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] This seems to be a problem with the PP lib and MPL, anyone any ideas? The config should never even see the BOOST_PP_CHECK_... macros. It should be using the Borland configuration:

Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8

2003-01-16 Thread David Abrahams
Paul Mensonides [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] This seems to be a problem with the PP lib and MPL, anyone any ideas? The config should never even see the BOOST_PP_CHECK_... macros. It should be using the Borland