Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-30 Thread Beman Dawes
At 11:38 AM 12/30/2002, Toon Knapen wrote: >On Sunday 22 December 2002 20:09, David Abrahams wrote: >> Alkis Evlogimenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> For those running regression tests (and most Boost.Build users), I >> really recommend setting ALL_LOCATE_TARGET so that the products of >> your b

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-30 Thread David Abrahams
Toon Knapen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 22 December 2002 20:09, David Abrahams wrote: >> Alkis Evlogimenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> For those running regression tests (and most Boost.Build users), I >> really recommend setting ALL_LOCATE_TARGET so that the products of >> your bui

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-30 Thread Toon Knapen
On Sunday 22 December 2002 20:09, David Abrahams wrote: > Alkis Evlogimenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For those running regression tests (and most Boost.Build users), I > really recommend setting ALL_LOCATE_TARGET so that the products of > your build all go into a single directory tree that's n

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-28 Thread John Maddock
> That's all correct, AFAIK. Exactly what is failing? Did you first delete > all the bin directories? If you look at the html table it's pretty obvious: there is no library name associated with each test, which makes the table more or less impossible to follow... John Maddock http://ourworld.com

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread David Abrahams
Alkis Evlogimenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 22 December 2002 12:39 pm, Beman Dawes wrote: >> At 02:30 PM 12/22/2002, David Abrahams wrote: >> >Alkis Evlogimenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> On Sunday 22 December 2002 03:51 am, John Maddock wrote: >> >>> The current Linux regr

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread Alkis Evlogimenos
On Sunday 22 December 2002 12:39 pm, Beman Dawes wrote: > At 02:30 PM 12/22/2002, David Abrahams wrote: > >Alkis Evlogimenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sunday 22 December 2002 03:51 am, John Maddock wrote: > >>> The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little > >>

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread Beman Dawes
At 02:30 PM 12/22/2002, David Abrahams wrote: >Alkis Evlogimenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sunday 22 December 2002 03:51 am, John Maddock wrote: >>> The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little >>> wrong, any idea what's up? >> >> I followed the instructions for

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread David Abrahams
Alkis Evlogimenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 22 December 2002 03:51 am, John Maddock wrote: >> The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little >> wrong, any idea what's up? > > I followed the instructions for the merge of the test-sane branch in > trunk. There

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread Alkis Evlogimenos
On Sunday 22 December 2002 03:51 am, John Maddock wrote: > The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little > wrong, any idea what's up? I followed the instructions for the merge of the test-sane branch in trunk. I recompiled bjam and the regression tools, and pass --dump-tes

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread David Abrahams
"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little wrong, > any idea what's up? Specifics? -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and c