Re: [boost] Re: better assertion technique

2003-04-23 Thread John Torjo
> > > > > > The output of the above (in case the assertion fails) can look like: > > > > > > Assertion failed: > > > '(v_(i) < v_(j)) || (i < 0) || (v_(k) == -1)' > > > i= '3' > > > j= '2' > > > k= '1' > > > > > This feature looks handy. Short macro like "v_" is IMHO acceptable, it > won't > > clas

Re: [boost] Re: better assertion technique

2003-04-23 Thread John Torjo
> > I wounder if it could be somehow merged with > http://www.cuj.com/experts/2104/alexandr.htm?topic=experts ? I've read the article. Great piece. I think we could do it. In case it's needed. Best, John ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://list