Re: [boost] Re: current_function.hpp extension

2003-07-22 Thread John Torjo
> > John Torjo schrieb: > > > Exactly! Don't do anything! But in order not to do anything, I need to know > > whether the compiler support a FUNCTION-like macro or not. > > > > Otherwise, I won't know (and assume it has), and print to the user something > > like: > > > > function= '(unknown)'. >

Re: [boost] Re: current_function.hpp extension

2003-07-22 Thread John Torjo
> John Torjo wrote: > > > Yes, I remain unconvinced ;-) > > This is because some compilers do not provide such a FUNCTION facility. > > VC6 is one of them. What should I do for it? > > It sounds like you are asking for the wrong macro! > You are trying to support a compiler that is outdated and l

Re: [boost] Re: current_function.hpp extension

2003-07-19 Thread Peter Dimov
Daniel Frey wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 02:08:24 +0200, Pavel Vozenilek wrote: > >> "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... >> SMART_ASSERT library implements BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION equivalent >> (it would be ugly to print out the default text). > > Log