>
> Sure. But the question is: which should the default be?
>
I'm not sure that we know enough to choose at this time.
John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.or
"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I assume the current definition of ~d1() is because some compilers
>> generate an implicit destructor with a non-empty
>> exception-specification, which then causes an error? I'm wondering if
>> we wouldn't be better off just defining ~d1 for those com
> I assume the current definition of ~d1() is because some compilers
> generate an implicit destructor with a non-empty
> exception-specification, which then causes an error? I'm wondering if
> we wouldn't be better off just defining ~d1 for those compilers, since
> many other compilers are likely
