Peter Dimov wrote:
There is currently no BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION since the idealistic goal
has been to cover all widely used compilers one day, so that
BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION always has a meaningful value. This may prove to be
impractical, of course, but I'd certainly prefer patches that enable
Bill Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Paul Bristow has convinced me that I need longer, clearer names
> for the I/O manipulators. First draft:
>
> pure_number
> national_currency
> international_currency
>
> number_stream_frac_digits
> number_decimal
"Eugene Lazutkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a few comments in no particular order.
>
>1) I cannot imaging someone programming in C++ and using "FILE*s,and file
>descriptors" instead of iostream & Co. You've must be talking about
>incomplete systems like embedded systems, which don't have c
Larry Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>wouldn't deadlock detection be another application? Taking the
>definition directly from my "long-ago" OS course memory, a deadlock
>occurs when one task or process holds a "handle" to a lock on a
>resource required by another task, which in turn, holds an
On Friday, Jul 18, 2003, at 15:21 America/Denver, John Madsen wrote:
"Eugene Lazutkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a few comments in no particular order.
1) I cannot imaging someone programming in C++ and using "FILE*s,and
file
descriptors" instead of iostream & Co. You've must be talking
Gregory Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Friday, Jul 18, 2003, at 15:21 America/Denver, John Madsen wrote:
>
>> "Eugene Lazutkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I have a few comments in no particular order.
>>>
>>> 1) I cannot imaging someone programming in C++ and using "FILE*s,and
>>> fil
On Saturday 19 July 2003 09:21, John Madsen wrote:
> "Eugene Lazutkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >4) Sometimes destruction of handles is more than a simple call to
> >one-argument procedure. Real example from Windows, which is
> > encountered frequently:
> >
> >HDC hDC = GetDC(hWindow);
> >/
"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> There is currently no BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION since the idealistic goal
> has been to cover all widely used compilers one day,
...
> On the other hand, perhaps you have a use case that clearly demonstrates
the
> nee
Eugene Lazutkin wrote:
I have a few comments in no particular order.
1) I cannot imaging someone programming in C++ and using "FILE*s,and file
descriptors" instead of iostream & Co. You've must be talking about
incomplete systems like embedded systems, which don't have complete standard
C++ librar
Russell Hind wrote:
Ok, but what happens if locking an already locked mutex where undefined
behaviour? This isn't this the same as the smart_ptr case? Who knows
how the actual implementation is on all the platforms, or future platforms?
Um, wasn't the question throw vs assert? In either case w
"Bill Seymour" (Friday, 18 July, 2003 12:43) says:
> Ilya seems to be giving me mutually contradictory requirements.
I have use cases/request for TWO distinctly different needs
that I encountered in financial applications:
1. storage (representation of financial data),
2. calculations.
They a
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 02:08:24 +0200, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
>> There is currently no BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION since the idealistic
>> goal has been to cover all widely used compilers one day,
> ...
>> On the other h
12 matches
Mail list logo
