RE: [boost] mpl and codewarrior 8.3 (patch)

2002-12-22 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
David Abrahams wrote: Hum, hum. I *am* seeing one error from the MPL regressions with cwpro8.3: [snip as_sequence.cpp test errors] However, it doesn't look like it's preprocessor-related. Yep, it's not. It's a known failure, which I didn't have time to track down yet... hmm, apparently,

Re: [boost] Boost 1.29.0 recursive_mutex With gcc On Linux

2002-12-22 Thread John Maddock
I guess we could check for the _XOPEN_SOURCE value in posix_features.hpp as well as for _XOPEN_VERSION, maybe this is the right thing to do for all Unixes, I don't know, anyone any ideas? http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html#t ag_02_02_01_01

Re: [boost] is the link-fail test working correctly in theregression tests?

2002-12-22 Thread David Abrahams
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I notice from the Win32 regression test results that all compilers are listed as failing the static_assert_test_fail_8 link-fail test. Yet when I look at the actual Jam output they are actually *passing* the test. Any ideas what's going on? That test

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread David Abrahams
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little wrong, any idea what's up? Specifics? -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread Alkis Evlogimenos
On Sunday 22 December 2002 03:51 am, John Maddock wrote: The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little wrong, any idea what's up? I followed the instructions for the merge of the test-sane branch in trunk. I recompiled bjam and the regression tools, and pass

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread David Abrahams
Alkis Evlogimenos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sunday 22 December 2002 03:51 am, John Maddock wrote: The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little wrong, any idea what's up? I followed the instructions for the merge of the test-sane branch in trunk. There should be

Re: [boost] Linux regression test results

2002-12-22 Thread Beman Dawes
At 02:30 PM 12/22/2002, David Abrahams wrote: Alkis Evlogimenos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sunday 22 December 2002 03:51 am, John Maddock wrote: The current Linux regression test results appear to be going a little wrong, any idea what's up? I followed the instructions for the merge of

[boost] Re: Re: Re: Still link problems due toboost/detail/winapi.hpp

2002-12-22 Thread Martin Schuerch
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 006701c2a82c$f1732dc0$1d00a8c0@pdimov2">news:006701c2a82c$f1732dc0$1d00a8c0@pdimov2... From: Martin Schuerch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [..] When the winapi.hpp declarations are in a namespace, they don't collide with the global declarations in

[boost] Re: Re: Re: Still link problems due toboost/detail/winapi.hpp

2002-12-22 Thread Martin Schuerch
Peter Dimov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 006701c2a82c$f1732dc0$1d00a8c0@pdimov2">news:006701c2a82c$f1732dc0$1d00a8c0@pdimov2006701c2a82c$f1732dc0$1d00a8c0@pdimov2">news:006701c2a82c$f1732dc0$1d00a8c0@pdimov2... From: Martin Schuerch mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL