It's only minor:
But boost::filesystem and boost::date_time have string conversion
methods such as
string()
native_file_string()
to_simple_string()
where as boost::format (and also stringstreams in the STL) have
str()
I don't know about the other libraries? Is there a standard for
I don't know about the other libraries? Is there a standard for this in
boost or is it up to the libraries? Should they be commonised?
Thorsten Ottosen wrote
Ideally, yes. I would prefer .c_str() for const char* conversion and
str() for std::string
In date-time there are several
I couldn't find this topic disscussed before, is it possible to use
tokenizer directly with an ifstream - instead of reading the contents of the
file into a string first?
Thanks,
Eoin.
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
Greetings!
The problem:
-
AFAIK, the two[1] libs built from boost always result in e.g.
libboost_thread.so. The problem is that currently no OS has support for
embedding the required ABI[2] into the runtime-linker info, therefore it only
knows a libray name.
When it finds a
Aleksey (and others),
I'm working on getting variant to compile under MSVC 6, but I've come
across what seems to be an ETI problem that needs a workaround.
However, I'm not sure what is the most appropriate way to make the fix.
Below is the error output from the regression tests
At 09:22 AM 6/4/2003, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
hi there,
I'v been trying to find some info as to why semaphores
are considered harmful by the boost::thread authors,
without luck. Is there any concise text describing
the problem ?
I've expanded the FAQ entry to read:
Why has class semaphore
I was writing a little article on the topic Its not finished i will
finish it tonight.
In the mean time take a look at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/21_strings/howto.html#3
I looked into the efficiency of stringtok function (from above link) as
opposed to C's strtok and the good news
The last 3 or 4 times that I have tried to check out the latest
boost, the checkout
gets most of the way through, and then hangs.
Here's what I see in my terminal:
lots of lines snipped
cvs server: Updating boost/tools/inspect/build
cvs server: Updating boost/tools/regression
cvs
Beman Dawes wrote:
I've expanded the FAQ entry to read:
Why has class semaphore disappeared?
Semaphore was removed as too error prone. The same effect can be
achieved with greater safety by the combination of a mutex and a
condition variable. Dijkstra (the semaphore's inventor), Hoare, and
