On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:59:19PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Would it be desirabe to have such class? I'm thinking about
struct do_nothing {
templateclass T
void operator()(const T) const {}
templateclass T1, class T2
void operator()(const T1 t1, const T2
Vladimir Prus wrote:
Hi,
just now I've nearly comitted the following addition to one of BGL
headers:
+ struct null_property_copier {
+templateclass V1, class V2
+void operator()(const V1, const V2) const {}
+ };
+
What stopped me is that is not BGL specific at all. Is there
