Pavel Vozenilek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Is there some reason you're defining your own iterators instead of
using iterator_facade or iterator_adaptor?
iterator_adaptor is used here, AFAICS.
Normally you don't
Hi Pavel!
Thank you very much for your comments. I agree with most of them. Thanks also for
the picture. Here are my notes to some of your comments.
Few notes to latest source:
1. circular_buffer_adaptor.html: the link in
The circular_buffer_space_optimized is defined in
the file
Pavel Vozenilek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
14. Btw, isn't cb_iterator::operator[]() added by mistake? I have
never seen such an operation for iterator. No, iterators do have
this operator.
Oops, newer used before :-o
Is there some reason you're defining your own iterators instead of
