RE: [boost] Some FC++ comments

2003-08-15 Thread Hartmut Kaiser
Brian McNamara wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Brian McNamara wrote: functional programming. Over the next couple of weeks I will make documentation of the boostified version of FC++ that's aimed at a C++ audience. Hopefully that will help. I've been working on a

Re: [boost] Some FC++ comments

2003-08-14 Thread Brian McNamara
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 11:27:08PM -0400, Brian McNamara wrote: I've been working on a draft of the documentation for the boostified version of FC++, and it's finally reached a good enough state to be potentially useful to you-all. Check out

RE: [boost] Some FC++ comments

2003-08-14 Thread Powell, Gary
Got it working: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~yannis/fc++/boostpaper/ is the HTML version. -- -Brian McNamara ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Nice! Glad to have another expression template library in boost. -Gary- ___ Unsubscribe other changes:

Re: [boost] Some FC++ comments

2003-08-14 Thread Brian McNamara
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Brian McNamara wrote: functional programming. Over the next couple of weeks I will make documentation of the boostified version of FC++ that's aimed at a C++ audience. Hopefully that will help. I've been working on a draft of the documentation for

Re: [boost] Some FC++ comments

2003-08-14 Thread Kresimir Fresl
Brian McNamara wrote: [...] Check out http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~yannis/fc++/boostpaper.pdf (I'll make it available in a more convenient format when I figure out how to work latex2html.) You can try TTH http://hutchinson.belmont.ma.us/tth/ or HEVEA

Re: [boost] Some FC++ comments

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Evans
Brian McNamara wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 11:27:08PM -0400, Brian McNamara wrote: I've been working on a draft of the documentation for the boostified version of FC++, and it's finally reached a good enough state to be potentially useful to you-all. Check out I've wanted to do dynamic

[boost] Some FC++ comments

2003-07-28 Thread Miroslav Silovic
Well, nobody posted anything definite on FC++, which is a pity, since I find this library potentially very useful. Here are some comments. Caveat: I haven't extensively used the library, but I have quite a bit of experience with functional programming. I won't comment on the naming scheme or

Re: [boost] Some FC++ comments

2003-07-28 Thread Brian McNamara
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:38:01PM +0200, Miroslav Silovic wrote: Well, nobody posted anything definite on FC++, which is a pity, since I find this library potentially very useful. Here are some comments. Caveat: I haven't extensively used the library, but I have quite a bit of experience