Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-12-31 Thread Matthias Troyer
n miniussi" >>> Cc: "Discussion of Boost.MPI development" >>> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:21:09 AM >>> Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API >>> >>> >>> On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Alain O Miniussi >>> wrote

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-12-04 Thread Alain O Miniussi
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:21:09 AM > > Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API > > > > > > On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Alain O Miniussi > > wrote: > > > > > > That being said, I do not have a strong opinion between: > > &g

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-29 Thread Hal Finkel
- Original Message - > From: "Matthias Troyer" > To: "alain miniussi" > Cc: "Discussion of Boost.MPI development" > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:21:09 AM > Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API > > > On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:11 P

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-29 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Alain O Miniussi wrote: > > That being said, I do not have a strong opinion between: > a) provide a 2 argument ctor > b) provide one argument ctor, and test provided level afterward. > > I just have a preference for b, because I find it simpler (both in terms > of A

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-29 Thread Alain O Miniussi
evelopment" > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:14:44 PM > >> Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API > >> > >> > >> So, to summarize, we have 3 issues: > >> 1) syntax: lower vs upper case and mt->threading. > >> 2) thro

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-29 Thread Alain O Miniussi
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 12:30 +0100, Matthias Troyer wrote: > On Nov 29, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Alain O Miniussi wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:22 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> So, to summarize, we have 3 issues: > >>> 1) syntax: lower vs upper case and mt->threading. > >>> 2) throw an excepti

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-29 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Nov 29, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Alain O Miniussi wrote: > On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:22 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> So, to summarize, we have 3 issues: >>> 1) syntax: lower vs upper case and mt->threading. >>> 2) throw an exception if the requested level is not available >>> 3) macro to control av

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-29 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Nov 28, 2012, at 9:22 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Alain O Miniussi" >> To: "Hal Finkel" >> Cc: "Discussion of Boost.MPI development" >> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:14:44 PM >> Subj

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-29 Thread Alain O Miniussi
t; > > > One last question: in my patch, I am still using MPI_Init instead of > > the > > supposedly equivalent MPI_Init(..single..) (keept for backward > > compatibility) I propose to only use MPI_Init_thread in the > > implementation. > > This is fine with m

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-28 Thread Hal Finkel
- Original Message - > From: "Alain O Miniussi" > To: "Hal Finkel" > Cc: "Discussion of Boost.MPI development" > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:14:44 PM > Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API > > > So, to summarize, we

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-28 Thread Alain O Miniussi
nal Message - > > From: "Matthias Troyer" > > To: "alain miniussi" , "Discussion of Boost.MPI > > development" > > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:25:18 AM > > Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API > > > > Hi Alain, &g

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-28 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Nov 28, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Matthias Troyer" >> To: "Discussion of Boost.MPI development" >> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:41:43 AM >> Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API >

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-28 Thread Hal Finkel
- Original Message - > From: "Matthias Troyer" > To: "Discussion of Boost.MPI development" > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:41:43 AM > Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API > > > On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: >

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-28 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Matthias Troyer" >> To: "alain miniussi" , "Discussion of Boost.MPI >> development" >> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:25:18 AM >> Sub

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-28 Thread Hal Finkel
- Original Message - > From: "Matthias Troyer" > To: "alain miniussi" , "Discussion of Boost.MPI > development" > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:25:18 AM > Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API > > Hi Alain, > > > On No

Re: [Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-28 Thread Matthias Troyer
Hi Alain, On Nov 27, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Alain O Miniussi wrote: > Hi, > > I have a tentative patch that is supposed to provide binding to the MPI > thread API. What is the best way to have it reviewed ? Thank you for your work. I have a few stylistic comments - shall I send them to you off-l

[Boost-mpi] Thread API

2012-11-27 Thread Alain O Miniussi
Hi, I have a tentative patch that is supposed to provide binding to the MPI thread API. What is the best way to have it reviewed ? It might be a ticket buthttps://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/report/15the referenced maintainer is Doug (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/report/15) and, probably since I