On 29 Aug 2016 at 23:03, Jon Kalb wrote:
> I would rewrite this to point out it's usually *their* code they
> return to summer after summer. It takes that long, if not longer, to
> get code into a Boost library.
>
> I´m not certain what is incorrect here. They are Boost projects correct?
Many
Can I ask the committee for thoughts upon and potential approval of the
following new review queue entry policy:
1. All libraries in the review queue without managers attached are
removed (including my own!) and the authors emailed to say the following
new policy applies. The review queue is
On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 7:54:44 PM UTC, Michael Caisse wrote:
>
> Rob - I think your updates look good. There has been a good discussion on
> the ML.
>
There has. I was surprised a consensus on a specific change emerged. My
thanks to the steering committee members who added valuably to
No new posts since
yesterday: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html
I sent two posts this morning, neither have turned up.
Niall
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Boost Steering Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
In the past it was felt that the cost benefit wasn't there. But now so many
more Boost libraries are hammering Travis, things may be different.
The SC may wish to understand what the difference between Travis and
Appveyor and the regression testing machines they've invested in is?
Niall
On
On Saturday, August 25, 2018 at 8:42:12 PM UTC+1, Michael Caisse wrote:
>
> I'm interested in Bryce's response to Marshall's question.
>
> If the conversation continues I would be happy to get back on ML topic by
> encouraging a proposal to the Steering Committee that we can evaluate.
>
> +1
And
On 04/01/2020 19:02, Ronald Garcia via Boost wrote:
> After roughly 14 years as a Boost Co-Review Wizard, I feel that the time has
> come for me to step down from the position, and make room for a new face with
> fresh ideas. It has been my pleasure to serve in this position for this time
>