Sure, will file one. But could you please elaborate a bit, is it just a docs defect or something more? Regards,Anton 18.05.2020, 20:08, "John Maddock via Boost-users" <boost-users@lists.boost.org>:On 18/05/2020 17:32, A.Dmitrovsky via Boost-users wrote: Hi, Strictly speaking, if
Hi,Strictly speaking, if I get it correct, that passage is about compatibility between different boost::multiprecision types (e.g. mp::int128 to mp::int256 conversion) and tells nothing about being able to convert to some other arithmetic type. So that's why I am here :) Regards,Anton 18.05.2020, 1
Hi, Boost::multiprecision docs [1] mentions that the type parameter of number::convert_to method should be "fundamental", pointing to the list of standard types ('A number can be converted to any fundamental (built-in) type)'.This is different to number::convert_to reference [2], which states that
