Re: [Boost-users] [multiprecision] why 128 bit numbers isn't used in msvc?

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 15:09, shar yashuv Giat via Boost-users <[boost-users@lists.boost.org](mailto:On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 15:09, shar yashuv Giat via Boost-users < wrote: > msvc added 128 bit numbers(in the header __msvc_int128.hpp). > I know multiprecision uses __128 to improve performance

[Boost-users] [multiprecision] why 128 bit numbers isn't used in msvc?

msvc added 128 bit numbers(in the header __msvc_int128.hpp). I know multiprecision uses __128 to improve performance so why doesn't it use msvc version? it's seems easy to change and will probably improve performance. ___ Boost-users mailing list Boost-us

Re: [Boost-users] Multiprecision

Me too On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, 20:04 shady mohamed via Boost-users, < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > I need to talk with mentor of this project to discuss the competency test > ___ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users@lists.boost.org > https://li

[Boost-users] Multiprecision

I need to talk with mentor of this project to discuss the competency test ___ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

[Boost-users] Multiprecision

I need to understand the competency test of multiprecision project ___ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

[Boost-users] [multiprecision] 128 bit integer support on Windows

Hi, I managed to get boost multi-precision to work with 128 bit integers on Windows using clang. I had to change this in clang.hpp: #if defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__) && !defined(BOOST_NVCC_CXX03) && !defined(_MSC_VER) <--- remove this last thing # define BOOST_HAS_INT128 #endif Clang-cl defines _

Re: [Boost-users] [Multiprecision] number conversion to __int128

.boost.org boost-users-boun...@lists.boost.org>> On Behalf Of A.Dmitrovsky via Boost-users Sent: 15 May 2020 11:03 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org boost-users@lists.boost.org> Cc: A.Dmitrovsky <td...@yandex.ru td...@yandex.ru>> Subject: [Boost-use

Re: [Boost-users] [Multiprecision] number conversion to __int128

stow via Boost-users" : From: Boost-users mailto:boost-users-boun...@lists.boost.org>> On Behalf Of A.Dmitrovsky via Boost-users Sent: 15 May 2020 11:03 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org <mailto:boost-users@lists.boost.org> Cc: A.Dmitrovsky mailto:td...@yandex.ru>>

Re: [Boost-users] [Multiprecision] number conversion to __int128

.2020, 16:51, "Paul A. Bristow via Boost-users" :From: Boost-users <boost-users-boun...@lists.boost.org> On Behalf Of A.Dmitrovsky via Boost-usersSent: 15 May 2020 11:03To: boost-users@lists.boost.orgCc: A.Dmitrovsky <td...@yandex.ru>Subject: [Boost-users] [Multiprecision] numb

Re: [Boost-users] [Multiprecision] number conversion to __int128

From: Boost-users On Behalf Of A.Dmitrovsky via Boost-users Sent: 15 May 2020 11:03 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Cc: A.Dmitrovsky Subject: [Boost-users] [Multiprecision] number conversion to __int128 Hi, Boost::multiprecision docs [1] mentions that the type parameter of number

Re: [Boost-users] [Multiprecision] number conversion to __int128

On 15/05/2020 11:03, A.Dmitrovsky via Boost-users wrote: Hi, Boost::multiprecision docs [1] mentions that the type parameter of number::convert_to method should be "fundamental", pointing to the list of standard types ('A |number| can be converted to any fundamental (built-in)

[Boost-users] [Multiprecision] number conversion to __int128

Hi, Boost::multiprecision docs [1] mentions that the type parameter of number::convert_to method should be "fundamental", pointing to the list of standard types ('A number can be converted to any fundamental (built-in) type)'.This is different to number::convert_to reference [2], which states that