Re: [Boost-users] Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?

I believe Zach Laine's library is the heir apparent -- it was accepted, but isn't in boost just yet. He describes some of the issues here: https://tzlaine.github.io/stl_interfaces/doc/html/boost_stlinterfaces/this_library_s_relationship_to_boost_iterator.html Jeff On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 2:00 P

Re: [Boost-users] [program_options] cmake error

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:21 AM Jeanette C. via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > Hey hey, > I get a cmake error about a non-existent directory from > boost::program_options, namely /include . > It only happens with the program_options library. Other libs included in > the > pro

Re: [Boost-users] asio and custom socket implementation

Not answering the question, but I don't know that there's documented extension points in the library for what you're wanting to do. It's surely possible, but maybe complex. I'd suggest asking for help on the asio list from https://think-async.com/. On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 7:11 AM Stanislav Zaikin

Re: [Boost-users] Building boost 1.72 with arm 64 bit gcc compiler

That's error coming from boost.context library build for assembly code. Don't think there's arm64 support there for gcc -- seems like it's looking for clang. Obviously if you're not using boost.context you can ignore. Not seeing an issue for this, but maybe worthy of filing a report: https://githu

Re: [Boost-users] Three-way comparison operator

Scanning the change log it doesn't seem likely boost.test was updated. Also given that the feature really just arrived in clang 10 in the last month and gcc 10 isn't yet released almost no one has reacted to operator<=> yet. All that said, most stuff like boost.test that uses operators shouldn't n

Re: [Boost-users] installing boost in mac

> (the newest version 1.73 is not working for me) but i read that it is not compatible with mac Why is it not compatible and where did you read that? Sounds like nonsense since before the 1.73 release Marshall Clow wrote during testing: I have built this candidate with the following configuratio

Re: [Boost-users] Boost-1.71.0 upgrade issue

Would be helpful to see the exact link command. If you are statically linking (.a files) then order might matter. On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 7:00 AM Tej Kumar via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > Hi Team, > > Hope you guys are doing well. > > I am trying to upgrade Boost to 1.7

Re: [Boost-users] Boost-1.71.0 upgrade issue

following order. > > 'boost_regex', > > 'boost_serialization', > > 'boost_filesystem', > > 'boost_thread', > > 'boost_system', > > 'boost_chrono', > > 'boost_timer', > > &g

Re: [Boost-users] [release] Boost 1.74.0 Release Candidate 2

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:02 AM Marshall Clow via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > The second release candidates for the 1.74.0 release are now available at: > > > > The SHA256 checksums are as follows: > > 903fd40074de8d

Re: [Boost-users] [Signals2] Deprecated header warning VS2017 Boost 1.74

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:07 PM Peter Barker via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Just upgraded to Boost 1.74 from Boost 1.71. I'm getting a warning: > > > I'll have to #define BOOST_ALLOW_DEPRECATED_HEADERS I guess, but I'm > surprised Boost libraries are using deprecat

Re: [Boost-users] A Newbie Boost.Build with Variants Question

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 2:12 PM Ryan Heniser via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am building Boost 1.61 (we need this old version for other libraries) > for the first time at work with Boost.Build (b2). I have successfully built > Boost (using b2) for gcc 4.8. If I

Re: [Boost-users] [release] Boost 1.75.0 Release Candidate 1

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 7:54 AM Marshall Clow via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > [release] Boost 1.75.0 Release Candidate 1 > > > The first release candidates for the 1.75.0 release are now available at: > > As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you downl

Re: [Boost-users] Boost 1.75.0 Release Candidate 1 -- macOS

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:45 PM DV Henkel-Wallace via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 06:54:13 -0800 > From: Marshall Clow > > > [release] Boost 1.75.0 Release Candidate 1 > > > Built fine on macOS 11.0.1 using llvm 11.0.0 > > ./b2 cxxstd=2a boost.locale.i

Re: [Boost-users] [iostreams] When plan to move to C++20

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:03 PM Seyyed Soroosh Hosseinalipour via Boost-users wrote: > Thanks for reply, but many of the libraries exist in boost, after some > years candidate for adding to C++ ISO, so I think if we migrate iostream to > latest standard of C++, we can candidate this library for

Re: [Boost-users] Could sprintf be replaced with snprintf?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:56 AM Matt Borland via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > > > > On Dec 11, 2023, at 8:59 PM, McGrath, Justin M > wrote: > > > > Has there been any movement on having someone else maintain ODEINT? I > don't know that I would be of much use, but I'm willin