[boost] Re: Bug in boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp

Vladimir Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED] ???/ ? ?: news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed, thanks! BTW, it's more convenient if you send changes as unified diff. They convey the same information as you've given above but are also directly applicable. Of course, for this change is

[boost] Re: checked_delete without assignment to 0 - why?

Markus Werle wrote: Hi! In one of Herb Sutters articles I saw that after deleting a pointer (a pimpl) he assigns 0 afterwards which seems to me like a good idea. (see e.g. http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/028.htm or http://tinyurl.com/bq8o) Maybe there is a good reason (efficiency?) why

Re: [boost] Configuration for Intel compiler

On Wed, 14 May 2003, John Maddock wrote: Your patch does not fix the problem at all. Ah, I see I got the Intel version check backwards, fixed (hopefully!) Yes, this time the conditional is correct. Unfortunately, this patch is still not good: __ICL is not defined so it doesn't work. My

RE: [boost] suncc and regex++

Does defining BOOST_REGEX_NO_EXTERNAL_TEMPLATES fix the issue? If it does let me know, Indeed, it works for the release build. Have not got to the point of building the regression tests yet, but at least the release library builds which is good enough for now. The debug build still fails for

Re: [boost] Configuration for Intel compiler

Guillaume Melquiond wrote: Yes, this time the conditional is correct. Unfortunately, this patch is still not good: __ICL is not defined so it doesn't work. My version of the compiler (the standard version available on Intel's website) does not define __ICL, but only __ICC and __INTEL_COMPILER. So

[boost] Re: checked_delete without assignment to 0 - why?

On Wed, 14 May 2003 12:39:09 +0200, Markus Werle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! In one of Herb Sutters articles I saw that after deleting a pointer (a pimpl) he assigns 0 afterwards which seems to me like a good idea. (see e.g. http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/028.htm or http://tinyurl.com/bq8o) Maybe

[boost] Re: suncc and regex++

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does defining BOOST_REGEX_NO_EXTERNAL_TEMPLATES fix the issue? If it does let me know, Indeed, it works for the release build. Have not got to the point of building the regression tests yet, but at least the release library builds which is good enough for now. The debug

[boost] bind, map and shared_ptr question

I could use some help with bind syntax. I have a container: Class MyClass { public: void foo(void); } Std::mapint, boost::shared_ptrMyClass I would like to construct a for_each loop with calls to foo for every pointer to MyClass in the map. Help greatly appreciated.

RE: [boost] Need simple graph example

The best graph library documentation is in http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0201729148 If you are going to really use the library you need to get the book. -Gary- -Original Message- From: Eric Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 10:30 PM To: Boost mailing list

[boost] Big number

Hi everyone, is anyone considering the addition of an arbitrary precision number library? Lucas/ ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: [boost] Big number

On Wed, 14 May 2003, Lucas Galfaso wrote: Hi everyone, is anyone considering the addition of an arbitrary precision number library? In short, yes. Several C++ implementations of arbitrary magnitude integers (bignums or bigints) are laying around Boost, but none have been proposed for

Re: [boost] bind, map and shared_ptr question

Terence Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could use some help with bind syntax. I have a container: Class MyClass { public: void foo(void); } Std::mapint, boost::shared_ptrMyClass I would like to construct a for_each loop with calls to foo for every pointer to MyClass in the map.