> This small patch removes all the warnings the type_traits regression suite > is actually encountering with Intel compiler on Linux. And thanks to this > patch, the number of warnings for the whole Boost regression suite on this > particular compiler drops from 50 to 1. > > Index: libs/type_traits/test/test.hpp > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/libs/type_traits/test/test.hpp,v > retrieving revision 1.4 > diff -u -r1.4 test.hpp > --- libs/type_traits/test/test.hpp 1 Feb 2003 12:12:08 -0000 1.4 > +++ libs/type_traits/test/test.hpp 18 May 2003 07:58:19 -0000 > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ > # ifdef BOOST_MSVC > # pragma warning(push) > # pragma warning(disable: 4181) > -# elif defined(__ICL) > +# elif defined(__ICL) || defined(__ICC) > # pragma warning(push) > # pragma warning(disable: 21) > # endif > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ > typedef const r_type cr_type; > # ifdef BOOST_MSVC > # pragma warning(pop) > -# elif defined(__ICL) > +# elif defined(__ICL) || defined(__ICC) > # pragma warning(pop) > # pragma warning(disable: 985) // identifier truncated in debug information > # endif > > The patch is trivial: the original file removes the warning on Windows, > this patch also removes them on Linux. I will apply the patch if nobody > complains. > > But, more importantly, I want to use this mail to repeat my proposal of a > BOOST_INTEL macro to encompass __INTEL_COMPILER, __ICL, __ICC, __ECC > (thanks to Richard Hadsell for pointing it out) macros. I am not asking > for somebody else to do it, I just want a bit of approval before preparing > the patches since it is not a small job to add a new config macro.
Yes, please go ahead with that, it looks like a good idea, thanks, John. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
