[boost] Slight error on home page

This is on . Look at the second link of the first line under the 19-Aug-2003 entry of "Latest News", which corresponds to 1.30.2. Someone used a backslash [\] for a URL-part separator instead of the proper regular-slash [/]. I guess the last writer uses Windows. But, i

Re: [boost] Problem using bjam with g++ 3.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 20 August 2003 20:41, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > This is my first attempt to build Boost 1.30.2 on FreeBSD with gcc 3.2 > installed. Debian 3.0/x86 here. > The command: > $ tools/build/jam_src/bin.freebsd/bjam "-sTOOLS=gcc" > builds Boost u

Re: [boost] feed_args.hpp bug (and patch)

Paul Hamilton wrote: > [...] I propose that we change the code: > > static const std::basic_string emptyStr; > > To: > > const std::basic_string emptyStr = ""; > > Which basically does exactly the same thing. = "" is not needed, it just forces a redundant strlen call (at least). As I already point

Re: [boost] Re: enable_if formal review ?

David Abrahams wrote: > Jaakko Jarvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 4. Non-SFINAE compilers >> >> Dave has an implementation of enable_if which defaults to being >> always enabled for compilers that do not support SFINAE. We do not >> think this is the right approach, and believe that attemts to

[boost] Re: [Fun] (( a xor b )) formal review request...

Daniel Frey wrote: > Paul Mensonides wrote: >>> #define xor )?BOOST_DETAIL_XOR( >> >> FYI, you cannot legally define "xor" because it is specifically *not* an >> identifier--even to the preprocessor. This is the primary difference >> between "keywords" and textual "alternative tokens." > > I admit