Hi, On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:38:12 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote:
> I think it's too late, let's go for a 1.31.0. I think that we'll hear > about problems with the 1.31.0 really soon after release and probably a > 1.31.1 can follow shortly after. Agreed. At our company we use a slightly different approach. We have two development streams, which we call 'Master' and 'Release'. At some time, when we are releasing a version from our main development branch ('Master'), we just make a copy of the current 'Master' state and check it into a different source control database ('Release'). Bug fixes will be added into the 'Master' and into the 'Release' branch. However, new functionality and interface changes are only added into the 'Master'. Of course it is a little bit more work to add the bug fixes into two seperate RCS. But this way, we are able to bring bug fix releases to our clients whenever there is a demand for it. Additionally, it then is possible to make complete structural changes to the 'Master' without concernig about the 'Release'. Regards, Johannes _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost