[boost] Re: checked_delete without assignment to 0 - why?

2003-05-14 Thread Alexander Nasonov
Markus Werle wrote: Hi! In one of Herb Sutters articles I saw that after deleting a pointer (a pimpl) he assigns 0 afterwards which seems to me like a good idea. (see e.g. http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/028.htm or http://tinyurl.com/bq8o) Maybe there is a good reason (efficiency?) why

[boost] Re: checked_delete without assignment to 0 - why?

2003-05-14 Thread Gennaro Prota
On Wed, 14 May 2003 12:39:09 +0200, Markus Werle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! In one of Herb Sutters articles I saw that after deleting a pointer (a pimpl) he assigns 0 afterwards which seems to me like a good idea. (see e.g. http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/028.htm or http://tinyurl.com/bq8o) Maybe