Hi Rob,
On 27.04.18 18:40, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 27.04.18 08:24, Udit Kumar wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> There is bit of discussion on linux-efi too , to handle DT update
>>>
>>> I guess some members of this forum are active
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 27.04.18 08:24, Udit Kumar wrote:
>> Hi
>> There is bit of discussion on linux-efi too , to handle DT update
>>
>> I guess some members of this forum are active there too.
>>
>>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:22:27AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 26/04/2018 17:52, William Mills wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/26/2018 08:43 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > > On 04/26/2018 10:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > On 25/04/2018 19:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 09:58:07AM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > This is the "priority" statement I think it problematic as discussed on
> > todays call. I think Boot### should be followed if present but boot
> > firmware writers should be cautioned not to hard code stupid stuff into
> > them.
On 26/04/2018 17:52, William Mills wrote:
On 04/26/2018 08:43 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 04/26/2018 10:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On 25/04/2018 19:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 25.04.18 19:54, Leif Lindholm wrote:
I took an action last week to provide a block of text for how
platforms
Hi Abner,
Answers below...
On 27/04/2018 07:06, Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) wrote:
Not sure if this mail list works or not.
Hi Grant,
GiIbert (from HPE, I think he is also in the mail list) and I are new to this
discussion thread . Here are couple questions for you, your answer can
On 26.04.18 18:52, William Mills wrote:
>
>
> On 04/26/2018 08:43 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 04/26/2018 10:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On 25/04/2018 19:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 25.04.18 19:54, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> I took an action last week to provide a block
On 27.04.18 08:24, Udit Kumar wrote:
> Hi
> There is bit of discussion on linux-efi too , to handle DT update
>
> I guess some members of this forum are active there too.
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-efi/msg13700.html
>
> To summaries
> 1/ Ownership of DTB
> IMO should be
Hi
There is bit of discussion on linux-efi too , to handle DT update
I guess some members of this forum are active there too.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-efi/msg13700.html
To summaries
1/ Ownership of DTB
IMO should be firmware and we should retain this
ownership in EBBR as well,