Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] Booting from eMMC without the boot protocol

2018-05-09 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 06:25:11PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> On 08.05.18 16:38, Daniel Thompson wrote: > >>> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:41:56PM -0400, William Mills wrote: > Image is dedicated for one machine type (or closely related set). > If raw mode is needed use MBR with 2MB

EBBR repo created

2018-05-09 Thread Grant Likely
Hi folks, Internal approval for EBBR has come through and we now have a GitHub repo. It's empty at the moment, but I'll be pushing the current EBBR text there shortly once I've fixed the license text. License will be CC-BY-SA https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr We can start using this page to

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] Booting from eMMC without the boot protocol

2018-05-09 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05/07/2018 08:46 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:17 PM, William Mills wrote: On 05/07/2018 11:49 AM, Rob Herring wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:41 PM, William Mills wrote: On 05/04/2018 01:03 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 04.05.2018 um 18:50 schrieb Alexander Graf: On

Re: [RFC PATCH] driver core: make deferring probe forever optional

2018-05-09 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05/08/2018 12:34 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Mon 07 May 12:55 PDT 2018, Rob Herring wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Tue 01 May 14:31 PDT 2018, Rob Herring wrote: Deferred probe will currently wait forever on dependent devices to probe, but sometimes a d

Re: [RFC PATCH] driver core: make deferring probe forever optional

2018-05-09 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05/07/2018 08:31 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Tue 01 May 14:31 PDT 2018, Rob Herring wrote: Deferred probe will currently wait forever on dependent devices to probe, but sometimes a driver will never exist. It's also not always critical for a driver to exist. Platforms can rely on default c